Arango E. vs Stefanini L.
Post Match Analysis, Highlights, Tips Colombia: Bogota WTA, clay 2025

Match Result

Since the match was played on 01 Tue Apr 2025, the score would be available in tennis result databases. Let's assume, for the purpose of this analysis, that Arango E. defeated Stefanini L. with a score of 6-4, 3-6, 6-3. This is only an assumed score for illustration.

Betting Analysis (Hypothetical)

Based on the *assumed* result and general knowledge of both players, a pre-match bet on Arango to win might have been a reasonable favorite. The over/under 20.5 games market is interesting. With the match going to three sets (as we've hypothetically assumed), the bet would have landed 'over'. A bet on "Both Players Win A Set" would have also been successful. The match's outcome suggests a relatively even contest, where both players showed resilience.

Player Performance Analysis (Hypothetical Data)

Below is a hypothetical performance table based on the assumed result. Real data would be needed for a precise analysis.

Statistic Arango E. Stefanini L.
Aces 3 1
Double Faults 4 2
1st Serve Percentage 60% 55%
1st Serve Points Won 68% 62%
2nd Serve Points Won 45% 40%
Break Points Saved 60% (3/5) 50% (2/4)
1st Return Points Won 38% 32%
2nd Return Points Won 60% 55%
Break Points Converted 50% (4/8) 40% (2/5)
Service Points Won 60% 56%
Return Points Won 44% 40%
Total Points Won 95 87
Match Points Saved 0/0 0/0
Games Won 15 13
Service Games Won 65% 60%
Return Games Won 35% 30%
Total Games Won 15 13

Key Considerations

Based on the *assumed* data and hypothetical outcome:

  • Break Point Conversion: Arango's slightly better break point conversion rate (50% vs. Stefanini's 40%) likely played a crucial role in securing the win, indicating better performance under pressure.
  • Service Game Dominance: Neither player dominated on serve, but Arango's higher percentage of service games won contributed to the victory.
  • Return Game Effectiveness: Arango secured more return points. In clay court tennis, being able to break is vital due to the slower surface.
  • Mental Toughness: A three-set match often hinges on mental fortitude. Arango seemingly regained composure after losing the second set, performing better in the deciding set.
  • Surface Conditions: Playing in Bogota at altitude could have impacted service speeds and ball bounce, potentially favoring players who can adapt to these conditions, maybe Arango.

Upset or Expected? Given the potential for close competition indicated by the three-set score, an Arango win likely wouldn't be considered a massive upset, especially if she had a slightly higher ranking or better recent form on clay. The Over/Under 20.5 game target was exceeded in our hypothethical scenario.