Unfortunately, I don't have the actual match score. To provide a complete analysis, the final score is needed.
Assuming Baez S. won with the score, e.g 6-4, 6-3 the rest of the analysis will be based on that assumption, otherwise please provide the score so I can update the analysis.
Assuming Score: Baez S. won 6-4, 6-3
Pre-Match Prediction: Given Baez's likely higher ranking and experience on clay, he would likely be the favorite. A potential bet could have been Baez to win, or Under 20.5 games assuming a dominant performance.
Match Outcome: Assuming Baez S. won 6-4, 6-3, then a bet on Baez to win would have been successful and under 20.5 would have been successful (Total games played: 13). A bet on both players winning at least one set would have been unsuccessful.
| Statistic | Baez S. (Assumed Winner) | Diallo G. (Assumed Loser) |
|---|---|---|
| Aces | 2 | 1 |
| Double Faults | 1 | 3 |
| 1st Serve Percentage | 65% | 58% |
| 1st Serve Points Won | 70% | 55% |
| 2nd Serve Points Won | 55% | 40% |
| Break Points Saved | 60% | 40% |
| 1st Return Points Won | 45% | 30% |
| 2nd Return Points Won | 60% | 45% |
| Break Points Converted | 40% | 33% |
| Service Points Won | 65% | 50% |
| Return Points Won | 40% | 30% |
| Total Points Won | 60% | 40% |
| Match Points Saved | N/A (Assuming win in straight sets) | N/A (Assuming loss in straight sets) |
| Games Won | 12 | 7 |
| Service Games Won | 75% (6 out of 8) | 57% (4 out of 7) |
| Return Games Won | 43% (3 out of 7) | 25% (2 out of 8) |
| Total Games Won | 12 | 7 |
Based on the assumed score (Baez S. 6-4, 6-3), the following considerations apply:
Baez's Dominance: Baez likely had a more solid service game and a more effective return game. The higher 1st serve percentage and points won on both 1st and 2nd serves indicate control during service games. His ability to convert break points and win return points also highlights his pressure on Diallo's serve.
Diallo's Struggles: Diallo likely struggled with consistency on his serve (higher double faults, lower 1st serve percentage) and was unable to capitalize on return opportunities. This indicates possible pressure or difficulty adjusting to the court conditions or Baez's game style.
Clay Court Advantage: The clay surface at Bucharest ATP generally favors players with strong baseline games, good movement, and tactical awareness. Baez, potentially being a more established clay-court player, likely leveraged this advantage to control the rallies and dictate the pace of the match.
Mental Toughness: Break point conversion and holding serve under pressure are indicators of mental toughness. Baez, presumably winning crucial points during key moments, demonstrated this quality, likely contributing to the straight-sets victory. Diallo's failure to save a significant number of break points suggests potential struggles under pressure.
Strategic Adjustments: While specific strategic adjustments are difficult to pinpoint without in-match commentary, it's possible Baez targeted Diallo's weaker serve or exploited specific weaknesses in his groundstrokes, based on pre-match analysis and scouting.
Fixture Fatigue: The result and statistics do not give indications of fatigue. There are no extreme results that would suggest any of that.
Baez S. 