Match Result

Since the match between Comesana F. and Bautista-Agut R. on 02 Wed Apr 2025 is a past event, the score needs to be obtained from a reliable sports data source. Without that live data access, I can't definitively provide the result.

(Assuming for the sake of demonstration and analysis that Bautista-Agut R. won 6-3, 6-4. The following analysis is based on this hypothetical result.)

Bet Analysis (Hypothetical Result: Bautista-Agut R. 6-3, 6-4)

Given the hypothetical result, Bautista-Agut was likely the favorite and won as expected. A bet on Bautista-Agut to win would have been successful. The total games played were 19 (6+3 + 6+4), meaning an "Under 20.5 games" bet would also have been a winner.

Recommended Bets Pre-Match (based on assumed favorite Bautista-Agut):

  • Win: Bautista-Agut (1.30 - Hypothetical Odd) - Likely winner
  • Over/Under 20.5 Games: Under 20.5 Games (1.85 - Hypothetical Odd) - Result was UNDER

Player Performance Analysis

(Note: Since this is a past match without provided data, the following table is hypothetical and represents potential performance characteristics based on the assumed result and general expectations for the players on clay.)

Statistic Comesana F. Bautista-Agut R.
Aces 2 3
Double Faults 3 1
1st Serve Percentage 58% 65%
1st Serve Points Won 60% 75%
2nd Serve Points Won 40% 55%
Break Points Saved 2/5 (40%) 2/3 (66.7%)
1st Return Points Won 25% 40%
2nd Return Points Won 45% 60%
Break Points Converted 1/3 (33.3%) 3/5 (60%)
Service Points Won 55% 70%
Return Points Won 30% 45%
Total Points Won 70 80
Match Points Saved N/A N/A
Games Won 7 12
Service Games Won 6/9 (66.7%) 6/7 (85.7%)
Return Games Won 1/7 (14.3%) 3/9 (33.3%)
Total Games Won 7 12

Key Considerations and Justifications

Based on the hypothetical data, here are key considerations:

  • Dominant Serve by Bautista-Agut: Bautista-Agut's higher 1st serve percentage and significantly better 1st and 2nd serve points won indicate a strong serving performance, putting pressure on Comesana's return game.
  • Return Game Difference: Bautista-Agut's superior return game (higher return points won and break point conversion rate) was a major factor in his victory. He consistently pressured Comesana's serve.
  • Break Point Conversion: Bautista-Agut's better break point conversion rate showcases his ability to capitalize on opportunities, a crucial aspect of winning tennis matches.
  • Surface Influence: Clay courts generally favor players with strong baseline games and tactical awareness. Bautista-Agut, being the more experienced player, likely used the clay to his advantage, constructing points carefully and exploiting Comesana's weaknesses.
  • Mental Toughness: Break point conversion and Bautista-Agut's ability to close out the match suggests better mental fortitude under pressure.
  • Strategic Adjustments (Hypothetical): It's possible Bautista-Agut strategically targeted Comesana's weaker 2nd serve, leading to the higher 2nd return points won. He likely employed cross-court rallies to test Comesana's movement and exploit angles.