Diallo G. vs Tseng C. H. 
Match: Diallo G. vs. Tseng C. H., Romania: Bucharest ATP, clay, 01 Tue Apr 2025.
Match Result: To provide a specific result, I need the actual score of the match. As this is a hypothetical analysis, I cannot populate it with real-world data.
Assume for this exercise, Tseng C. H. won 6-4, 6-4
Betting Analysis (Hypothetical): Without pre-match odds, it's impossible to determine the favorite. If Tseng C.H. was the favorite and won in straight sets as assumed above, a bet on Tseng C.H. to win would be successful. Also a bet for Under 20.5 total games (6+4+6+4 = 20 total games) would be a win.
| Statistic | Diallo G. (Hypothetical) | Tseng C. H. (Hypothetical) |
|---|---|---|
| Aces | 3 | 5 |
| Double Faults | 2 | 1 |
| 1st Serve Percentage | 58% | 65% |
| 1st Serve Points Won | 65% | 72% |
| 2nd Serve Points Won | 45% | 55% |
| Break Points Saved | 3/6 (50%) | 4/5 (80%) |
| 1st Return Points Won | 28% | 35% |
| 2nd Return Points Won | 45% | 55% |
| Break Points Converted | 1/5 (20%) | 2/6 (33%) |
| Service Points Won | 58% | 65% |
| Return Points Won | 35% | 42% |
| Total Points Won | 65 | 75 |
| Match Points Saved | N/A | N/A |
| Games Won | 8 | 12 |
| Service Games Won | 6/10 (60%) | 6/8 (75%) |
| Return Games Won | 2/8 (25%) | 4/10 (40%) |
| Total Games Won | 8 | 12 |
Key Considerations and Justifications:
Based on the hypothetical data above, Tseng C.H. had a stronger serving performance, evidenced by a higher first serve percentage (65% vs. 58%) and higher percentage of points won on both first and second serves. This allowed Tseng C.H. to control the match more effectively. The return game was a significant factor, with Tseng C.H. winning a greater percentage of return points, leading to more break point opportunities. Tseng C.H. was also more clutch, converting a higher percentage of break points than Diallo G.. Also, more total point won which means better performance overall during the game.
The clay court surface likely favored players with solid baseline games and the ability to construct points effectively. Tseng C.H.'s slightly better groundstroke game and tactical decision making, demonstrated by better break point conversion rates, might have been the deciding factors.