Match Result:

Since the match was played on April 2, 2025, the results are available and should be inserted here. For example: Gasquet R. defeated Cobolli F. 7-6(5), 6-4

Betting Analysis:

To provide an accurate betting analysis, the pre-match odds are crucial. Let's assume Gasquet was the slight favorite. Given the hypothetical score, the pre-match analysis would be :

  • Match Outcome: If Gasquet was favored, the successful outcome suggests the market was relatively accurate. If Cobolli was favored, it would be considered an upset.
  • Over/Under 20.5 Games: The total games played were 7+6+6+4 = 23 games. This exceeds the 20.5 games threshold. Those who bet on over 20.5 games would have won.
  • Both Players Win a Set: Given Gasquet won in straight sets, this bet would have lost.

Hypothetical Bet suggestion (Assuming Gasquet was slight favorite): Gasquet to win, Over 20.5 games.

Player Performance Analysis:

Since this is a hypothetical analysis of a past match, the exact detailed statistics are unavailable. We will create a plausible representation based on the assumed scoreline and general player profiles.

Statistic Gasquet R. Cobolli F.
Aces 4 6
Double Faults 1 3
1st Serve Percentage 65% 60%
1st Serve Points Won 72% 68%
2nd Serve Points Won 55% 45%
Break Points Saved 66% (2/3) 50% (1/2)
1st Return Points Won 32% 28%
2nd Return Points Won 55% 45%
Break Points Converted 33% (1/3) 33% (1/3)
Service Points Won 65% 60%
Return Points Won 35% 40%
Total Points Won 75 70
Match Points Saved N/A N/A
Games Won 13 10
Service Games Won 88% (7/8) 75% (6/8)
Return Games Won 25% (2/8) 12% (1/8)
Total Games Won 13 10

Key Considerations:

Based on the assumed score and hypothetical statistics:

  • Serving Advantage: Both players didn't showcase dominant serving performance, but Gasquet held his serve more effectively. The first set tiebreak suggests a close battle on serve.
  • Return Game: Gasquet's ability to convert one crucial break point per set proved decisive, tilting the match in his favor. Cobolli's struggles on return were significant.
  • Mental Toughness: Winning a tiebreak often indicates mental resilience. This, combined with Gasquet's experience, likely contributed to his victory.
  • Surface Impact: Clay generally favors players with strong baseline games and tactical variations. Gasquet's game style is likely well suited for this surface, allowing him to outmaneuver Cobolli.
  • Strategic Adjustments: There's no information about strategic adjustments from in-match data.