Match Result: Ugo Carabelli C. vs Albot R. - Romania: Bucharest ATP, Clay, 01 Tue Apr 2025

Unfortunately, I do not have the final score for this specific match. As an AI, my knowledge is limited to the data I was trained on, and I don't have real-time access to live sports scores. To know the score you need to look for a sports information provider for past match results.

Betting Analysis

Without the match result, providing accurate betting predictions is impossible. However, we can discuss *potential* pre-match considerations based on general knowledge and statistics. Generally, Albot would have been considered the favorite based on his higher ranking and experience. A potential bet could have been Albot to win, with odds likely around 1.40-1.70. A surprise bet could have been Carabelli winning at odds of 2.20 or higher. Over/Under 20.5 games would depend on predicted match length, a tight 3 set match would be more than 20.5 games.

Player Performance Analysis

Since I don't have the specific match statistics, I can only provide a *template* table. When real data is available, it should be populated here.

Statistic Ugo Carabelli C. Radu Albot
Aces [Data] [Data]
Double Faults [Data] [Data]
1st Serve Percentage [Data] [Data]
1st Serve Points Won [Data] [Data]
2nd Serve Points Won [Data] [Data]
Break Points Saved [Data] [Data]
1st Return Points Won [Data] [Data]
2nd Return Points Won [Data] [Data]
Break Points Converted [Data] [Data]
Service Points Won [Data] [Data]
Return Points Won [Data] [Data]
Total Points Won [Data] [Data]
Match Points Saved [Data] [Data]
Games Won [Data] [Data]
Service Games Won [Data] [Data]
Return Games Won [Data] [Data]
Total Games Won [Data] [Data]

Key Considerations

Without the match data, these are only hypothetical considerations.

  • Serve Dominance: The player with a higher percentage of service points won and fewer double faults would likely have had a significant advantage. A dominant serve would translate to easier holds and more opportunities to pressure the opponent's serve.
  • Return Game Effectiveness: A strong return game, measured by a high percentage of return points won and break points converted, would have been crucial, especially on clay where breaks are more frequent. The quality of the return of serve is even more important than the serve itself.
  • Mental Fortitude: Break point conversion rates and match points saved are indicators of mental toughness. Winning crucial points under pressure could have been the deciding factor. How many times did Carabelli come back to win the game from 0-40 for example.
  • Surface Impact: Clay courts generally favor players with strong defensive skills, patience, and the ability to construct points. A player comfortable with long rallies and sliding would have had an advantage.
  • Strategic Adjustments: Observing whether players changed their tactics during the match (e.g., approaching the net more frequently, targeting the opponent's weaker side) would be important.

If Albot won, it could have been attributed to his experience and better serve performance. If Carabelli won, it might have been due to superior clay court game, a higher break point conversion rate, or an upset of the expected performance.