Match Result:

Unfortunately, the final score for Ugo Carabelli C. vs. Misolic F. at Romania: Bucharest ATP, clay, 02 Wed Apr 2025 is not available. As this is a past match, this information would typically be available from official tennis score providers.

To proceed with the analysis as intended, hypothetical score data will be assumed and used for illustrative purposes only, acknowledging the analysis is not representative of the actual match events.

Hypothetical Score: Ugo Carabelli C. 2 - 1 Misolic F. (6-4, 3-6, 6-3)

Betting Analysis (Hypothetical):

Based on the hypothetical score (Carabelli winning 2-1), and considering the players and clay surface, the following pre-match bet scenarios can be considered:

  • Match Outcome (Win/Loss): If Carabelli was the underdog and won (as assumed), a bet on Carabelli to win would have been a surprise and high-value bet. If Misolic was the favorite and lost, it represents an upset.
  • Over/Under 20.5 Games: The total games played in the hypothetical scenario is 6+4+3+6+6+3 = 28 games. Therefore, a bet on Over 20.5 games would have been successful.
  • Both Players to Win a Set: Since the match ended 2-1, both players won at least one set. A bet on this outcome would also have been successful.

Player Performance Analysis (Hypothetical Data):

The following table represents hypothetical player performance data, used to illustrate the analysis. Actual data would be required for a realistic assessment.

Statistic Ugo Carabelli C. Misolic F.
Aces 3 5
Double Faults 2 3
1st Serve Percentage 62% 58%
1st Serve Points Won 70% 65%
2nd Serve Points Won 50% 45%
Break Points Saved 60% (3/5) 40% (2/5)
1st Return Points Won 35% 30%
2nd Return Points Won 55% 50%
Break Points Converted 40% (2/5) 33% (2/6)
Service Points Won 62% 55%
Return Points Won 45% 38%
Total Points Won 100 90
Match Points Saved 0 0
Games Won 15 13
Service Games Won 75% 66%
Return Games Won 33% 25%
Total Games Won 15 13

Key Considerations (Based on Hypothetical Data):

Based on the assumed score and hypothetical statistics:

  • Serving Performance: While Misolic had more aces, Carabelli's higher 1st serve percentage and 1st serve points won suggest a more consistent and effective serving performance overall.
  • Return Game: Carabelli's better Return points Won (45% vs 38%) and Break point conversion (40% vs 33%) suggest his return game was more effective at applying pressure on Misolic's serve.
  • Mental Toughness: Carabelli's slightly better break points saved (60% vs 40%) could indicate better mental fortitude in crucial moments.
  • Clay Court Advantage: Both players are likely comfortable on clay. The nuances of the clay court could have favored Carabelli's style slightly, perhaps with his ability to construct points and grind out rallies.
  • Strategic Adjustments: Without actual match data, it's impossible to determine specific strategic changes. However, it's possible that Carabelli exploited a weakness in Misolic's backhand, or adjusted his serving patterns to target Misolic's weaker return.
  • Upset or Expected Result: The result of a Carabelli win would have been an upset if Misolic was a higher-ranked/seeded player and hence a pre-match favorite.

Important Note: This analysis is based entirely on a hypothetical score and data. Real match data is crucial for an accurate assessment.