The match between Chirico L. and Andreeva E. at USA: Charleston WTA, clay, on 01 Tue Apr 2025, has concluded. To provide a proper analysis, the actual score is needed. Assuming for the sake of example and demonstration that **Andreeva E. won 2-1 (6-4, 3-6, 6-2)**.
Given a hypothetical Andreeva victory, a pre-match analysis would likely have favored Andreeva, although clay can be unpredictable. A "both players win at least one set" bet would have been successful in this example. Over/Under 20.5 games: In this hypothetical example (6-4, 3-6, 6-2), the total games played is 27, therefore exceeding 20.5. A bet on "Over 20.5 games" would have been successful.
Statistic | Chirico L. | Andreeva E. |
---|---|---|
Aces | 2 | 5 |
Double Faults | 4 | 1 |
1st Serve Percentage | 58% | 65% |
1st Serve Points Won | 62% | 70% |
2nd Serve Points Won | 45% | 55% |
Break Points Saved | 50% (3/6) | 66.7% (4/6) |
1st Return Points Won | 30% | 38% |
2nd Return Points Won | 45% | 55% |
Break Points Converted | 33.3% (2/6) | 50% (3/6) |
Service Points Won | 55% | 65% |
Return Points Won | 35% | 45% |
Total Points Won | 45% | 55% |
Match Points Saved | N/A | N/A |
Games Won | 13 | 15 |
Service Games Won | 60% | 70% |
Return Games Won | 30% | 40% |
Total Games Won | 13 | 15 |
Based on the hypothetical data and assuming an Andreeva victory, several factors could have influenced the match. Andreeva's stronger serve, as suggested by the higher 1st serve percentage and points won on both 1st and 2nd serve, likely put Chirico under pressure. Andreeva also capitalized on return opportunities better, as indicated by a higher percentage of return points won and break point conversion rate. Chirico's lower break point conversion rate suggests a weakness in clutch moments. The clay surface may have slightly favored Andreeva's movement and ability to construct points. The assumed score indicates a possible adjustment by Andreeva after losing the second set, improving her level in the third to secure the win. This highlights mental resilience.