Match Result

Unfortunately, I do not have access to the internet to obtain the exact score of the Gracheva V. vs. Mertens E. match played on April 3, 2025, in Charleston. To find this information, please consult reputable sports news sites or tennis data providers.

(Example if we knew the score: Gracheva V. defeated Mertens E. 6-4, 3-6, 6-2)

Betting Analysis (Hypothetical)

Without the actual result, this is a speculative betting analysis. Assuming Mertens E. was the favorite due to her higher ranking and experience, a successful bet against the favorite (backing Gracheva V.) would have yielded a higher payout if Gracheva won. If the match had been close and gone to three sets, an "Over 20.5 games" bet would likely have been a winner. To give a suggestion, this would depend on if Mertens E. was the favourite at the time. With Mertens E. favoured it is expected the outcome is Mertens E. win, and for less risk taking it would be Mertens E. win, and over 20.5 games. An upset with Gracheva V. winning with under 20.5 games.

Performance Statistics Analysis (Hypothetical)

As I do not have the actual statistics of the match, the table below provides a hypothetical comparison based on common tennis metrics. Actual values would differ.

Statistic Gracheva V. (Hypothetical) Mertens E. (Hypothetical)
Aces 3 2
Double Faults 4 3
1st Serve Percentage 60% 65%
1st Serve Points Won 68% 70%
2nd Serve Points Won 45% 48%
Break Points Saved 60% 50%
1st Return Points Won 30% 28%
2nd Return Points Won 55% 52%
Break Points Converted 40% 30%
Service Points Won 60% 62%
Return Points Won 40% 38%
Total Points Won 100 95
Match Points Saved 1 0
Games Won 15 12
Service Games Won 62% 60%
Return Games Won 35% 38%
Total Games Won 3 2

Key Considerations and Justifications

Based on the hypothetical data, some key considerations could be:

  • Serve Dominance: If Mertens E. had a significantly higher 1st serve percentage and points won on her 1st serve, it indicates a strong serving performance that put pressure on Gracheva V.'s return game.
  • Return Game Impact: If Gracheva V. managed to convert a higher percentage of break points despite Mertens E.'s strong serve, it suggests an effective return game that capitalized on Mertens' weaker service games.
  • Mental Toughness: If Gracheva V. saved a crucial match point(s), it highlights mental resilience under pressure, which could have swayed the match's momentum.
  • Surface Advantage: Clay courts generally favor players with strong defensive skills and the ability to construct points patiently. If one player is known for better movement and stamina on clay, this likely influenced the match.
  • Strategic Adjustments: Examining the match progression (if available) would reveal any tactical changes made by either player, such as targeting a specific weakness in their opponent's game or altering their serve placement.

To provide a truly accurate analysis, the actual match statistics are required.