The match between Watson H. and Shymanovich I. at USA: Charleston WTA, clay, on 01 Tue Apr 2025 has concluded. Unfortunately, the final score is not available to me and therefore cannot be displayed. Please find the score through a reputable sports score provider or by searching the match on official tennis websites.
Since this match has already been played, we're analysing it retrospectively. Without knowing the pre-match odds, it's impossible to determine if there was an upset. However, analysing performance data will help determine if a favorite was justified, or if the outcome suggested an inaccurate pre-match assessment. We can also assess whether the total games played aligned with an Over/Under 20.5 games prediction.
To analyze further, we need to know:
Assuming a pre-match favorite was correctly identified, and if the favorite won comfortably, a win bet on that player would have been successful. If the underdog won, it would have been considered an upset. If the total games were 21 or more, an "Over 20.5 games" bet would have been successful. If the total games were 20 or fewer, the "Under 20.5 games" bet would have won. We need the score details to be able to analyze the over under.
Note: Since the actual match statistics are unavailable, I will create a hypothetical table to illustrate the *type* of analysis that would be conducted with real data. The numbers below are purely illustrative.
Statistic | Watson H. | Shymanovich I. |
---|---|---|
Aces | 3 | 1 |
Double Faults | 5 | 2 |
1st Serve Percentage | 58% | 65% |
1st Serve Points Won | 65% | 70% |
2nd Serve Points Won | 45% | 50% |
Break Points Saved | 60% (3/5) | 40% (2/5) |
1st Return Points Won | 30% | 35% |
2nd Return Points Won | 50% | 55% |
Break Points Converted | 40% (2/5) | 60% (3/5) |
Service Points Won | 58% | 62% |
Return Points Won | 45% | 48% |
Total Points Won | 52% | 48% |
Match Points Saved | 0/0 | 0/0 |
Games Won | 10 | 9 |
Service Games Won | 60% | 60% |
Return Games Won | 40% | 40% |
Total Games Won | 52% | 48% |
Based on the *hypothetical* data above, the following key considerations can be made:
Justifications: If, according to pre-match analysis, Watson was favored, Shymanovich's higher break point conversion rate and stronger serving stats indicate a potential miscalculation of the odds. These factors could explain an upset. If Shymanovich was favored, these factors support the outcome. Analyzing the total games played in the match (once the result is known) will indicate how well the match was judged with respect to overall number of games.
The surface conditions could favor one player's style if, for instance, Watson was known to be a predominantly serve and volley player, which is less effective on clay. Conversely, if Shymanovich was a grinder with excellent movement and spin, the clay surface would likely be advantageous.