Match Result: Tabilo A. vs. Brooksby J. (USA: Houston ATP, Clay, 02 Wed Apr 2025)

The final score is not available without historical data lookup. Assuming the match has been played, the result would have been either Tabilo won or Brooksby won. An accurate score cannot be fabricated. Let's proceed with a hypothetical analysis assuming Tabilo won in 3 sets: 6-4, 3-6, 6-3.

Betting Analysis (Hypothetical Outcome: Tabilo Wins)

Pre-match, Brooksby might have been considered a slight favorite due to a perceived higher ceiling and past performances. However, the clay surface could have leveled the playing field, giving Tabilo a decent chance. A surprise bet might have been Tabilo to win. If Tabilo won 6-4, 3-6, 6-3, the total games played would be 28, exceeding the Over/Under 20.5 games. Therefore, the "Over 20.5 games" bet would have been successful. If Tabilo Won, then the match outcome will be favor for Tabilo and against Brooksby win.

Player Performance Analysis

Since real match statistics are unavailable, the following table presents hypothetical performance data, used for demonstrative purposes:

Metric Tabilo A. Brooksby J.
Aces 7 3
Double Faults 2 4
1st Serve Percentage 65% 60%
1st Serve Points Won 72% 68%
2nd Serve Points Won 55% 50%
Break Points Saved 60% (3/5) 40% (2/5)
1st Return Points Won 32% 28%
2nd Return Points Won 50% 45%
Break Points Converted 40% (2/5) 20% (1/5)
Service Points Won 65% 60%
Return Points Won 35% 40%
Total Points Won 100 90
Match Points Saved 0/0 0/0
Games Won 15 13
Service Games Won 75% (9/12) 69% (9/13)
Return Games Won 31% (4/13) 25% (3/12)
Total Games Won 15 13

Key Considerations and Justifications

Based on the hypothetical statistics, Tabilo's higher ace count and better 1st serve points won percentage suggest he dominated on serve slightly more than Brooksby. This can be crucial on clay where holding serve is essential. Furthermore, Tabilo's better break point conversion rate (40% vs 20%) demonstrates superior mental toughness in critical moments. Brooksby double fault issues also contributed negatively. The surface conditions likely favored Tabilo's game slightly. If Tabilo is left handed, his serve will be more effective on clay. The strategic adjustment during the match might have involved Tabilo targeting Brooksby's weaker backhand, common on clay, forcing errors and creating break point opportunities.